This week’s Torah portion recounts the last of the ten
plagues: the ten wonders God displays in order to change the official status of
the Israelites. Moses acts like the legal counsel, approaching the bench of a
hostile government numerous times, advocating for a righteous decree. After years of being whipped to build
bricks and living in poverty, it is time for the Israelites to repossess
control of their bodies and their lives.
Yet, in telling the story, we tend to rush past those
moments when Moses comes before Pharaoh and demands safe passage for the
Israelites. We take it for granted
that at least ten times Moses had to insist his way into Pharaoh’s palace
chamber to stand there surrounded by armed guards and disapproving eyes…all to
advocate on behalf of his people.
After how many refusals would you have turned back? After how many refusals would you just
have accepted the status quo?
Moses is the archetype of a process that still goes on
today: protesting to the highest authorities to speak to our highest morals. He
teaches that we must keep stepping forward, even when we encounter setbacks.
This is often what we encounter when we seek change through the political
process.
MLK experienced it in his era – appropriately being dubbed a
“modern day Moses.” The world saw Moses cry “let my people go” when King stood
on the steps of the Lincoln Memorial delivering his “I Have a Dream speech.”
His choice of venue was an demand to the government, it connected him to the
century of appeals made to the highest courts and representatives – all the way
back to the Emancipation Proclamation and the 13th Amendment. He too
was demanding: let my people go.
Let them go forward into a better society, girded with all the tools
they need to succeed. Let them be
the agents of their own destiny.
Ultimately, MLK, like Moses, understood the power of the
political process. In a collection
of sermons, King shared this thought: “Let us never succumb to the temptation
of believing that legislation and judicial decrees play only a minor role in
solving this problem. Morality cannot be legislated, but behavior can be
regulated. Judicial decrees may not change the heart, but they can restrain the
heartless.”
This sentiment is highly applicable to the Supreme Court’s
landmark Roe v. Wade decision in 1973.
Now, in regards to reproductive rights, we cannot put words
in King’s mouth. I don’t know how
he stood on abortion. What we do
know, though, is that he supported family planning, stating as much when he
accepted an award from Planned Parenthood in 1966.
Yet regardless of where King stood, his words, “Judicial
decrees may not change the heart, but they can restrain the heartless,”
resonate.
We forget what the landscape was like for women prior to
1973. Single women who became
pregnant were fired from their jobs.
They were sent away, out of sight, to maternity homes for unwed
mothers. Married women who became
pregnant were forced to carry their pregnancies to term even if they could not
afford to feed that child, or if the mother was sick, or even if the fetus
would never be able to live outside the womb because it had not developed the
necessary organs.
The way women were treated was heartless. They had no choice in their fate. There was no trust that they could
think and feel enough to make decisions for themselves.
40 years ago, Roe v. Wade changed that.
The historic decision codified what we know, what we have
known for a long time: choice is the backbone of freedom. When you’re free, it means that you
determine your destiny. You are
the keeper of the keys.
This concept of choice stands at the center of Judaism. When Moses demands the Israelites be
let out of Egyptian slavery, it is ultimately so that they may trek towards
Sinai and willingly, freely, choose a better life through receiving the Torah.
Even today, the Reform movement thrives on the concept of choice and creating
personal meaning.
Because what is slavery? The tyrannical seizure of a
person’s body and life choices. Freedom is being released into a world where
one can develop their own moral compass and make decisions for him/herself.
Unfortunately, maintaining this freedom is an ongoing
struggle. Just as Pharaoh would offer freedom and then revoke it, in the 40
years after Roe v. Wade, individuals and groups have tried to take back a
woman’s right to choose. 40 years later, women are being forced to listen to
fetal heartbeats, to pay out of pocket for simple health care screenings, and,
in the most blatant seizure of her body, forced to invasive transvaginal
ultrasounds.
Yet we should not be discouraged. Like Moses, like Martin Luther King, we can continue to step
forward in the name of justice. We
can be on the front lines. We can
be diligent in making sure that women, minorities, and all others are afforded
the freedom that our ancestors eventually won. We may feel like we’re standing before the Red Sea and that
the challenge is insurmountable, but if we dive in, the seas of change might
just part.
No comments:
Post a Comment